WebProfessor Linda Berger rejoins her Feminist Judgments: Rewritten Opinions of the United States Supreme Court coauthors in this essay presenting feminism as the foundation for … WebDec 9, 2014 · Extract. Consistent with feminist scholarship more broadly, feminist legal methodology is more clearly unified by a common objective—revealing and challenging the role of law in exacerbating women's inequality—than specific methods per se. Nevertheless, common methods and approaches to the feminist legal study of institutions can be …
Feminist judgments : from theory to practice. - Durham …
WebApr 16, 2024 · Hunter R (2012) The power of feminist judgments? Feminist Legal Studies 20(2): 135–148. Crossref. ISI. Google Scholar. Hunter R (2013) Justice Marcia Neave: A feminist judge. ... Feminist Judgments: From Theory to Practice. Oxford and Portland, OR: Hart Publishing. Google Scholar. Kamau W (2013) Women judges and magistrates … WebAug 11, 2016 · Feminist Judgments brings together a group of scholars and lawyers to rewrite, using feminist reasoning, the most significant US Supreme Court cases on … o with colon
Iris Publication - University College London
WebSep 30, 2010 · While feminist legal scholarship has thrived within universities and in some sectors of legal practice, it has yet to have much impact within the judiciary ... Feminist Judgments: From Theory to … WebJul 9, 2024 · Linda Mulcahy and Cathy Andrews, ‘Baird v Marks and Spencer’ in Rosemary Hunter, Clare McGlynn and Erika Rackley (eds) Feminist Judgments: From Theory to Practice (Hart Publishing 2010) 17 Pages Posted: 9 Jul 2024 WebIn this book, a group of feminist legal scholars put theory into practice in judgment form, by writing the 'missing' feminist judgments in key cases. The cases chosen are significant decisions in English law across a broad range of substantive areas. The cases originate from a variety of levels but are primarily opinions of the Court of Appeal ... rank 1 chogath